4.7 Article

Coercivity enhancement of sintered Nd-Fe-B magnets by efficiently diffusing DyF3 based on electrophoretic deposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 631, 期 -, 页码 315-320

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.078

关键词

Sintered Nd-Fe-B magnet; Electrophoretic deposition; DyF3 diffusion; Core-shell microstructure

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551776]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2014DFB50130, 2011CB612304]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51172168, 51072139]
  4. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2012BAE01B03]
  5. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation [2014A610162]
  6. Ningbo Science and Technology Project [2013B10004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using electrophoretic deposition (EPD) method, we coated DyF3 powder onto the sintered Nd-Fe-B magnets, investigated the changes in magnetic and microstructural properties of DyF3 EPD-coated magnets and clarified the optimum diffusion temperature and time. Through controlling the process parameters (such as temperature and time), the coercivity was increased from 16.1 to 22.8 kOe with a slight reduction in remanence after the diffusion. A significant increment in coercivity of more than 6.5 kOe was achieved with less than 1.2 wt.% Dy in the Dy-free original magnets. Microstructure analysis suggested that the increase of the coercivity was closely related to the concentration and the distribution of Dy. At 100 mu m from the surface of the magnet, Dy concentration gradually increased with the diffusion temperature and time, which corresponds well with the change of coercivity. During the diffusion, Dy favors to substitute for Nd to form the (Nd, Dy)(2)Fe14B core-shell phases in the outer region of Nd2Fe14B grains. The higher magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the core-shell phase and the improved decoupling by the continuous grain boundary phase contribute to the coercivity enhancement. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据