4.7 Article

Targeted Disruption of the Prostaglandin E2 E-Prostanoid 2 Receptor Exacerbates Vascular Neointimal Formation in Mice

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.226142

关键词

angioplasty; eicosanoids; prostaglandins; receptors; restenosis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation [81030003, 30821001, 30890041, 30870905]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [2010CB912503]
  3. 111 Project of China [B07001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Restenosis after angioplasty remains a major clinical problem. Prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) plays an important role in vascular homeostasis. The PGE(2) receptor E-prostanoid 2 (EP2) is involved in the proliferation and migration of various cell types. We aimed to determine the role of EP2 in the pathogenesis of neointimal formation after vascular injury. Methods and Results-Wire-mediated vascular injury was induced in the femoral arteries of male wild-type (EP2+/+) and EP2 gene-deficient (EP2-/-) mice. In EP2+/+ mice, EP2 mRNA expression was increased in injured vessels for at least 4 weeks after vascular injury. Neointimal hyperplasia was markedly accelerated in EP2-/- mice, which was associated with increased proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and increased cyclin D1 expression in the neointima layer. Platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) treatment resulted in more significant cell proliferation and migration in VSMCs of EP2-/- mice than in those of EP2+/+ mice. Activation and overexpression of EP2 attenuated PDGF-BB-elicited cell proliferation and migration, induced G(1)-> S-phase arrest and reduced PDGF-BB-stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation in EP2+/+ VSMCs. Conclusion-These findings reveal a novel role of the EP2 receptor in neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury. The EP2 receptor may represent a potential therapeutic target for restenosis after angioplasty. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1739-1747.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据