4.7 Article

Wear behavior and corrosion properties of Fe-based thin film metallic glasses

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 650, 期 -, 页码 127-135

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.256

关键词

Magnetron sputtering; Fe-based thin film metallic glasses; Adhesion; Wear; Corrosion

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51271081, 51301072, 51471074]
  2. Postdoc Science Foundation of China [2013M542016, 2014T70698]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fe48Mo14Cr15Y2C15B6 (at%) thin film metallic glasses (TFMGs) with various thickness (125-745 nm) were deposited on glass and 304 stainless steel (SS) by using single-alloy target magnetron sputtering. X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy verified the fully amorphous structure of the as-deposited films. Results of dry friction and wear tests against Si3N4 demonstrated that Fe-based TFMGs had lower friction coefficient and nearly three times higher wear resistance with respective to 304SS. The corrosion properties of the Fe-based TFMGs were evaluated in an artificial sweat solution by various electrochemical analytical techniques, including potentiodynamic, potentiostatic polarization and Mott-Schottky analysis. It was shown that the Fe-based TFMGs exhibited highly stable passivity and pitting resistance, which was significantly higher than that of uncoated 304SS. The good corrosion resistance of Fe-based TFMGs results from the lower defect density and higher thickness of the asformed passive film as compared to 304SS. The pitting of the Fe-based TFMGs follows three distinct stages, i.e., pitting initiation, metastable pitting and stable pitting, as well as substrate dissolution-induced film rupture due to the adsorption and penetration of chloride ions in the artificial sweat solution. These findings are expected to broaden the application of Fe-based TFMGs as a highly protective film for electronic device applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据