4.7 Article

Moderately Decreased Cholesterol Absorption Rates Are Associated With a Large Atheroprotective Effect

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.194605

关键词

cholesterol; absorption; atherosclerosis; reverse cholesterol transport; macrophage

资金

  1. American Heart Association [0755295B]
  2. National Institute of Health [P50 HL077107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Human treatment with ezetimibe results in a moderate 50% to 54% decrease in cholesterol absorption and a 15% to 20% decrease in plasma LDL-cholesterol levels; nevertheless, the efficacy of ezetimibe therapy has been recently challenged by the ENHANCE trial. We examined the efficacy of a moderate decrease in cholesterol absorption in preventing atherosclerosis formation in the mouse. Methods and Results-Congenic 14DKK animals, consisting of a castaneus (CASA/Rk) chromosome 14 interval introgressed onto the C57BL/6J background, displayed a moderate decrease in cholesterol absorption rates. The effect of moderately decreased absorption on atherosclerosis formation was determined in 14DKK apolipoprotein E knockouts (14DKK-apoEKO). When compared to chow diet-fed control apoEKO mice, congenic 14DKK-apoEKO displayed a moderate 41% decrease in cholesterol absorption rates, 30% to 37% decrease in plasma cholesterol levels, and a 70% decrease in atherosclerosis formation. Studies on cholesterol efflux and reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) from 14DKK bone marrow-derived macrophages rejected a 14DKK interval-dependent atheroprotective effects that operate in macrophages. In contrast, 14DKK-apoEKO congenics were characterized by a 60% increase in RCT from peripheral tissue macrophages. Conclusions-These studies strongly suggest that moderately decreased cholesterol absorption rates result in a large atheroprotective effect attributable to a decrease in plasma cholesterol levels and an increase in RCT from peripheral tissue macrophages. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 1745-1750.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据