3.9 Review

Long-term risks of bisphosphonate therapy

期刊

出版社

SBEM-SOC BRASIL ENDOCRINOLOGIA & METABOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/0004-2730000003308

关键词

Bisphosphonates; alendronate; ibandronate; risedronate; zoledronate; fractures; osteonecrosis

资金

  1. AbbVie
  2. Amarin
  3. Amgen
  4. Bristol-Meyers Squibb
  5. Corcept
  6. Endo
  7. Imagepace
  8. Janssen
  9. Lilly
  10. Merck
  11. Novartis
  12. Noven
  13. Pfizer/Wyeth
  14. Radius
  15. Sanofi-Aventis
  16. NPS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective this study was to summarize long-term risks associated with bisphosphonate therapy. Search of relevant medical publications for data from clinical trials, trial extensions, observational studies and post-marketing reports. Trial extensions and modifications did not reveal significant long-term safety issues. Observational data suggest at least as many benefits as risks. Post-marketing reports of musculoskeletal pain, osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures have been widely circulated in the lay press. Most focus on long-terms risks has been on osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures which occur in patients who have not received bisphosphonate therapy but may be more frequent (though still uncommon) in patients who have been on treatment for 5 years or longer. Lower-risk patients may be able to stop treatment after 3-5 years for a drug holiday, which mitigates these long-term risks; for higher risk patients, therapy through 6-10 years appears to be advisable and offers more benefits than risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据