4.7 Article

The effect of cooling rate on the plasticity of amorphous metal

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 648, 期 -, 页码 18-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.212

关键词

Amorphous; Cooling rate; Plasticity; High vacuum die-casting

资金

  1. Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Special Functional Materials in Shenzhen University [T201310]
  2. State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials [20131303]
  3. Schoolmaster Fund of Xi'an Technological University [XAGDXJJ1309]
  4. National Basic Science Development Foundation of China [2012CB619602-3, 2012CB619606-2]
  5. Shaanxi Education Foundation of China [04JK211, 2012JC13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deficient plasticity is one of the largest barriers for the application of amorphous metal as structural materials. In this article, how to improve the plasticity of amorphous metal by means of adjusting the cooling rate was discussed in detail. The experimental samples were prepared by high vacuum die-casting with Zr53.2Ti13.8Cu8.9Ni5.6Be13.5Nb5 (at. %) and Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10 Be-22.5 (at. %). And then the plastic samples were compared with the common amorphous samples from perspective of preparation parameters and microstructure. The relationship among mechanical properties, cooling rate and microstructure was discussed so as to discover the essential microstructural mechanism of plasticity of amorphous metal. As for Zr53.2Ti13.8Cu8.9Ni5.6Be13.5Nb5 alloy whose critical cooling rate is higher, the morphology of crystalline phases can be adjusted by changing the cooling rate to improve its plasticity. As for Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10 Be-22.5 alloy whose critical cooling rate is lower, phase separation which can be obtained by controlling the cooling rate would be an effective method to get amorphous metal with high plasticity. In other words, appropriate cooling rate is a key important parameter to make the brittle amorphous metal into ductile materials. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据