3.9 Article

Clinical Features and Outcome of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm Differences Between Adults and Children

期刊

ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
卷 143, 期 12, 页码 1218-1221

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.12.1218

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To delineate the clinical and pathological characteristics of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm ( SPN), compare them between adults and children, and determine the predictive features suggesting malignant potential. Design: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgery for a pathologically confirmed SPN. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Patients: Sixty-two consecutive patients who underwent surgery for a pathologically confirmed SPN between 1985 and 2006. Main Outcome Measures: Demographic information and clinical presentation, radiological details, surgical data, pathological characteristics, postoperative course, and long-term survival. Results: Among 62 patients, 47 patients were adults ( mean age, 36 years; range, 18-63 years) and 15 patients were children ( mean age, 12 years; range, 8-13 years). A palpable mass was the most common presenting symptom in children ( 9 of 15; 60%) and an incidentally detected pancreatic mass, in adults ( 18 of 47; 38.3%) ( P= .001). The mean tumor size in children was significantly larger than in adults ( 8.0 vs 6.0 cm; P < .03). In children, the tumor was located in the head of the pancreas ( 10 of 15; 66.7%) and in adults, in the body or tail ( 38 of 47; 80.9%) ( P = .001). Nine patients ( 14.5%) had malignant SPN. There was no significant clinical factor suggesting malignant potential. Two patients had a tumor recurrence. They were still alive after debulking surgery. There were no tumor-related deaths. Conclusion: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm had different clinical features in adults and children. Because long-term survival can be achieved, even with the synchronous or metachronous metastatic lesions, SPN should be treated aggressively, with complete resection, even if this requires metastatectomy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据