4.6 Article

Development of a Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale in Stroke Patients

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.005

关键词

Cerebrovascular accident; Rehabilitation

资金

  1. National Science Council [NSC 96-2314-B-037-028]
  2. National Health Research Institutes [NHRI-EX99-9512PI]
  3. E-Da Hospital [EDAHP100002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To develop a computerized adaptive testing system of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale (CAT-FM) to efficiently and reliably assess motor function in patients with stroke. Design: First, a simulation study was used to develop and examine the psychometric properties of the CAT-FM. Second, a field study was employed to determine the administration efficiency of the CAT-FM. Setting: One medical center and 1 teaching hospital. Participants: Patients' responses (n=301) were used for the simulation study; 49 patients participated in the field study. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The 2 CAT-FM item banks (upper extremity and lower extremity) include 37 items from the original Fugl-Meyer scale. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the CAT-FM were determined by the simulation study. Results: Two stopping rules (reliability >= 0.9 or an increase of reliability <.01 after testing an item) were used. The simulation study showed that the CAT-FM had high reliability (>=.93 for upper-extremity and lower-extremity subscales) and concurrent validity (Pearson r >=.91 for the upper-extremity and lower-extremity subscales and motor scale). The responsiveness was moderate (standardized response mean for the upper extremity=.67, lower extremity=.79, and motor=.77) for the 226 patients who completed both assessments at 14 and 90 days after stroke. The field study found that, on average, the time needed to administer the CAT-FM was 242 seconds with 4.7 items. Conclusions: The CAT-FM is an efficient, reliable, valid, and responsive clinical tool for assessing motor function in patients with stroke. (c) 2012 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据