4.6 Article

Cytotoxic Oleane-type Triterpene Saponins from Glochidion eriocarpum

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 19-26

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12272-012-0102-2

关键词

Glochidion eriocarpum; Euphorbiaceae; Triterpenoid saponin; Glochierioside; Cytotoxic activity; Apoptosis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology, Republic of Korea [2009-0093815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anticancer activity of ten compounds from the aerial parts of Glochidion eriocarpum were evaluated on two human cancer cell lines, HL-60 and HCT-116. Compounds 1-4 displayed highly potent cytotoxic activity on the HCT-116 cancer cell line with IC50 values ranging of 0.41 similar to 1.16 mu M. Compounds 1-4 significantly inhibited the HL-60 cell line with IC50 values ranging of 4.51 similar to 6.33 mu M. These results suggested that the benzoyl group at the C-22 position in oleane-type triterpene saponins was essential for cytotoxicity towards tumor cells. Moreover, compounds 2 and 3 showed more potent cytotoxicity than compounds 1 and 4 against HL-60 and HCT-116 cells. With respect to the mechanism underlying cytotoxicity, compounds 1-4 increased chromatin condensation, a typical apoptotic characteristic in HL-60 and HCT-116 cells. In the mechanism of apoptosis induction, compounds 1-4 reduced Bc1-2 expression, whereas the expression of Bax was increased compared to controls in HCT-116 cells. In addition, compounds 1-4 decreased the level of procaspase-3. The cleavage of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), a vital substrate of effector caspase, was observed in HCT-116 cells. Furthermore, the induction of apoptosis was also accompanied by an activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and p38 kinase in HCT-116 cells. These findings provide evidence demonstrating that the pro-apoptotic effects of compounds 1-4 are mediated through the activation of ERK and p38 in HCT-116 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据