4.4 Article

Effects of phytoestrogen genistein on genioglossus function and oestrogen receptors expression in ovariectomized rats

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY
卷 54, 期 11, 页码 1029-1034

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.09.002

关键词

Genioglossus; Fatigue resistance; Phytoestrogen genistein; Oestrogen receptor alpha; Oestrogen receptor beta

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30572070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study was designed to investigate the effects of genistein on genioglossal muscle function and the expression of oestrogen receptors (ERB) in the ovariectomized rats. Design: Fifty female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 5 groups: the control group (SHAM), the ovariectomized group (OVX), the ovariectomized rats receiving low genistein dosage (OVX+L), the moderate genistein dosage group (OVX+M) and the high genistein dosage group (OVX+H). Oestradiol level was detected by radioimmunity. The isometric twitch tension (P-t) and tetanic tension (P-0) of the GG muscle were measured in response to electrical field stimulation. The expression of ERs on the mRNA and protein levels was measured by real-time PCR and western blot respectively. Results: Ovariectomy decreased muscle fatigue resistance and the expression of different ERB significantly. Genistein treatment resulted in a dose-dependent protective effect on muscle fatigability and a parallel dose-responsive increase in the expression of oestrogen receptors mRNA and protein levels in genioglossus, with larger effects on oestrogen receptor beta vs. alpha. In contrast to the improvements in fatigability, there was no treatment effect on isometric twitch or tetanic tensions. Conclusion: The results indicated that genistein increased muscle fatigue resistance in addition to effects on receptors, and the up-regulation of receptors expression may be a possible mechanism by which genistein improved fatigue. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据