3.9 Article

Assessing Susceptibility to Age-Related Macular Degeneration With Genetic Markers and Environmental Factors

期刊

ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 129, 期 3, 页码 344-351

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.10

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institute [N01-EY-0-2127]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Veterans Affairs
  4. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  5. Macula Vision Research Foundation
  6. Ruth and Milton Steinbach Fund Inc
  7. Research to Prevent Blindness
  8. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  9. Chinese National 985 Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the independent and joint effects of genetic factors and environmental variables on advanced forms of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), including geographic atrophy and choroidal neo-vascularization, and to develop a predictive model with genetic and environmental factors included. Methods: Demographic information, including age at onset, smoking status, and body mass index, was collected for 1844 participants. Genotypes were evaluated for 8 variants in 5 genes related to AMD. Unconditional logistic regression analyses were performed to generate a risk predictive model. Results: All genetic variants showed a strong association with AMD. Multivariate odds ratios were 3.52 (95% confidence interval, 2.08-5.94) for complement factor H, CFH rs1061170 CC, 4.21 (2.30-7.70) for CFH rs2274700 CC, 0.46 (0.27-0.80) for C2 rs9332739 CC/CG, 0.44 (0.30-0.66) for CFB rs641153 TT/ CT, 10.99 (6.04-19.97) for HTRA1/LOC387715 rs10490924 TT, and 2.66 (1.43-4.96) for C3 rs2230199 GG. Smoking was independently associated with advanced AMD after controlling for age, sex, body mass index, and all genetic variants. Conclusion: CFH confers more risk to the bilaterality of geographic atrophy, whereas HTRA1/LOC387715 contributes more to the bilaterality of choroidal neovascularization. C3 confers more risk for geographic atrophy than choroidal neovascularization. Risk models with combined genetic and environmental factors have notable discrimination power.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据