4.4 Article

New taxonomic markers for identification of Rhizobium leguminosarum and discrimination between closely related species

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 191, 期 3, 页码 207-219

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-008-0447-6

关键词

Diversity; Identification of R. leguminosarum; PCR detection; Pss genes

资金

  1. Department of Soil, Water and Climate, Universitet of Minnesota, St. Paul, USA [UMR1632, UMR1899, UMR6204, UMR6358, UMR6821, UMR7370, UMR7639]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N N303 092234]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rhizobia, producing species-specific exopolysaccharides (EPSs), comprise a very diverse group of soil bacteria that are able to establish nitrogen-fixing symbioses with legumes. Based on the sequences of R. leguminosarum EPS synthesis genes, a sensitive and reliable PCR-based method for identification and subsequent discrimination between Rhizobium species has been developed and tested. For identification of R. leguminosarum, primer sets I-III complementary to sequences of rosR, pssA and pssY genes were proposed. Further sets of primers (IV-VII) were designed for discrimination between R. leguminosarum biovars. The usefulness of the method was examined using a wide range of R. leguminosarum strains isolated from different host plants nodules originating from different regions of Poland. We demonstrate a high discriminating power of primer sets I-III that allow distinguishing R. leguminosarum and two closely related species, R. etli and R. gallicum. This new approach is applicable to identification of R. leguminosarum strains, originating from nodules or soil, where many other closely related bacteria are expected to be present. Based on the nucleotide sequence of rosR and pssA genes, phylogenetic relationships of selected R. leguminosarum isolates were determined. Our results indicate that both rosR and pssA might be useful markers to differentiate and define relationships within a group of R. leguminosarum strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据