4.5 Article

Non-invasive assessment of cardiac hemodynamics in patients with advanced cancer and with chronic heart failure: a pilot feasibility study

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 261-267

出版社

TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2013.34574

关键词

heart failure; cancer; hemodynamics; cardiac output; stroke volume

资金

  1. European Commission [241558]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Relationships between cardiac pressure and volume have been suggested as markers of cardiac contractility; parameters include stroke work and the maximal rate of pressure rise during isovolumic contraction (dP/dt(max)). Patients with cancer often display dyspnea and fatigue. These are also frequent symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). The reasons for similar symptoms in cancer patients are unknown. Using the novel Nexfin Finapres technique, we sought to assess measures of cardiac performance in patients with cancer and compare these values with those from control subjects and patients with chronic HF. Material and methods: We prospectively studied 98 patients (control n = 18, chronic HF n = 37, advanced pancreatic or colorectal cancer n = 43) and assessed blood pressure (BP), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and dP/dt(max) at rest. Results: All parameters of interest could be assessed using the Nexfin Finapres technique with SV and CO being significantly higher in patients with cancer than in controls (both p < 0.05). The SV was significantly higher in patients with chronic HF than in controls (p < 0.05). In patients with cancer, SV correlated with age (r = -0.45, p < 0.01) and body weight (r = +0.55, p = 0.0001). In chronic HF, SV declined with increasing age (r = -0.49, p < 0.01); in control subjects, SV increased with increasing body weight (r = +0.57, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Patients with cancer tended to display elevated BP, CO, SV, and dP/dt(max) as compared to control subjects and patients with HE These findings may reveal an elevated risk for cardiovascular diseases in this group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据