4.5 Article

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and executive dysfunction. A case-control study on the significance of frontal white matter changes detected by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 260-266

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.03.014

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; White matter changes; Executive function; Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)

资金

  1. Lund University Hospital
  2. Professor Bror Gadelius Foundation
  3. Greta and Johan Kock Foundation
  4. Swedish Alzheimer Foundation
  5. Swedish Dementia Foundation (Stiftelsen Demensfonden)
  6. Pfizer AB Sweden
  7. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [KAW 1998.0182]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White matter (WM) changes are frequently seen on structural imaging in AD but the clinical relevance of these changes is uncertain. Frontal WM pathology is often observed upon neuropathological examination in AD. Since frontal cortical/sub-cortical pathology is known to relate to executive dysfunction, the aim was to elucidate if frontal WM changes in AD correlated with executive dysfunction. In all, 15 AD patients and 15 age-matched control cases were investigated in the study, which covered conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), DTI, neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological examinations. Reduced performance on neuropsychological testing of executive function correlated significantly with an increasing degree of frontal WM changes detected by DTI in the AD group, while no such correlation was observed for the controls. Conventional semi-quantitative MRI assessment did not correlate with results on neuropsychological testing of executive function in any of the groups. The structural correlate to certain dimensions of executive dysfunction in AD patients could be related to changes in the deep frontal WM. DTI appears to be more sensitive in the detection of clinically significant WM alterations than conventional semi-quantitative MRI. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据