4.6 Article

Grb2 adaptor undergoes conformational change upon dimerization

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 475, 期 1, 页码 25-35

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.04.008

关键词

Grb2 dimerization; isothermal titration calorimetry; analytical ultra-centrifugation; size-exclusion chromatography; mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grb2 is an adaptor protein that couples activated receptor tyrosine kinases to downstream effector molecules such as Ras and Akt. Despite being a central player in mitogenic signaling and a target for therapeutic intervention, the role of Grb2 oligomerization in cellular signaling is not well understood. Here, using the techniques of size-exclusion chromatography, mass spectrometry, analytical ultra-centrifugation and isothermal titration calorimetry, we demonstrate that Grb2 exists in monomer-dimer equilibrium in solution and that the dissociation of dimer into monomers is entropically-driven without an unfavorable enthalpic change at physiological temperatures. Our data indicate that enthalpy and entropy of dimer dissociation are highly temperature-dependent and largely compensate each other resulting in negligible effect of temperature on the overall free energy. From the plot of enthalpy change versus temperature, the magnitude of heat capacity change derived is much smaller than that expected from the rather large molecular surfaces becoming solvent-occluded upon Grb2 dimerization, implying that Grb2 monomers undergo conformational rearrangement upon dimerization. 3D structural models of Grb2 dimer and monomers suggest strongly that such conformational rearrangement upon dimerization may arise from domain swapping. Taken together, our study provides novel insights into the role of Grb2 as an adaptor in cellular signaling circuitry and how Grb2 dimerization may impart high fidelity in signal transduction as well as lead to rapid signal amplification upon receptor stimulation. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据