4.0 Article

Monitoring of spatial water quality in lakes by remote sensing and transect measurements

期刊

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM HEALTH & MANAGEMENT
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 176-184

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/14634981003796295

关键词

eutrophication; MERIS instrument; large lake; turbidity; humic substances; cyanobacterial biomass

资金

  1. Tekes (Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation)
  2. Eu [FP7-ENV-2009-1/244121]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New tools, such as intensive measurements, together with advanced mathematical models, are increasingly needed in water management and environmental research. The new approaches are being developed at Pyhajarvi, a large (155 km(2)) lake in southwest Finland. Pyhajarvi is highly valuable in terms of water supply, fisheries and recreational use. The ecological state of Pyhajarvi has been closely monitored for decades, particularly since eutrophication became a major concern in the late 1980s. Two relatively new research methods were used to assess the spatial water quality of Pyhajarvi: (i) transect measurements from a moving boat; and (ii) remote sensing data based estimates. First, a flow-through method from a moving boat was successfully used to collect high resolution transect water quality data from the lake over six field campaigns. The method is relatively accurate but costly, and its use is mostly limited to special campaigns and intensive research, but not for long-term monitoring. Second, remote sensing methods were used to retrieve water quality information which was found consistent with the surface measurements from the boat. The estimation of parameters such as turbidity and humic substance concentration is possible with simple algorithms when using remote sensing (MERIS) data. The quantitative estimation of water quality by the methods used here requires concurrent in situ measurements for algorithm training. These methods will be further developed utilizing frequent on-line water quality and weather data from a recently installed lake float.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据