4.4 Article

Bond strength of repaired composite resins: surface treatments, adhesive systems, and composite type

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 520-533

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2015.1111187

关键词

Composite repair; air abrasion; laser; aging; surface treatment; microtensile bond strength

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of three different surface treatments and two different adhesives on the microtensile bond strength (TBS) of repaired composites using the same or different type of resin. Twenty-four nano-hybrid (Ceram X mono-C) and 24 nanofilled (Filtek Ultimate-F) composite discs were prepared. The specimens were aged with 5000 thermocycles and randomly divided into groups according to the surface treatment methods: (a) phosphoric acid (b) Er:YAG laser and (c) aluminum trioxide particle (air abrasion). Fresh composite resins (C and F) were added to the treated surfaces with two different adhesives (two-step and one-step self-etch adhesives). Then, the specimens were aged again. The stick-shaped specimens were prepared from the discs (n=25) and the sticks were subjected to the TBS test. Results indicated that significant differences were found in TBS values among the surface treatment methods. In the C groups, the highest TBS value (41.3 +/- 8.3MPa) was recorded in the air abrasion and one-step self-etch adhesive group, which were repaired with the same kind of composite. In the F groups, the highest TBS value was observed in the air abrasion and one-step self-etch adhesive (37.6 +/- 12.3MPa) group. The treatment with air abrasion is more effective than the others, and it may be suggested for composite repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据