4.3 Article

Comparison of three types of adhesives in attaching coral transplants to clam shell substrates

期刊

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.944

关键词

coral transplantation; reef restoration; self-attachment; giant clam shells; Philippines

资金

  1. EIII-Opearl Commission [510657]
  2. [361]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Nubbins from 12 coral species were transplanted onto dead giant clam shells at three sites in a lagoon near Bolinao, north-western Philippines. Transplants were attached using three types of adhesives: cyanoacrylate glue (SG), epoxy putty (EP) and marine epoxy (ME) and were monitored over five months for detachment, in situ mortality and natural self-attachment by tissue growth. 2. Corals attached with SG showed a significantly higher rate of detachment (logrank test) than those attached with either EP or M E (P < 0.001 in each case). Also, those attached with EP showed a higher rate of detachment than corals attached with M E (logrank = 6.46. P < 0.05). 3. ANOVA (P > 0.05) and survival analysis (logrank =2.85, P > 0.05) showed no among-adhesives differences in in situ mortality. Among the species used, Porites cylindrica, Pavona frondifera, Heliopora coerulea and Porites rus had the highest survivorship with 82%, 80%, 76% and 73%, respectively. Of nubbins alive at the end of the experiment and also displayed the highest cumulative rates of self-attachment. Species with the lowest survival rates included Acropora muricata and four pocilloporids. 4. Although there was no significant difference in the number of self-attaching transplants among the adhesives, corals transplanted using ME and EP self-attached earlier than those transplanted using SG (logrank = 11.19, P < 0.01). 5. Results from this study highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate means of attaching corals to substrates and carefully considering species-specific traits of candidate corals for transplantation. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据