4.5 Article

Environmental salinity and osmoregulatory processes in cultured flatfish

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 10-29

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.12424

关键词

flatfish; osmoregulation; environmental salinity; energy metabolism

资金

  1. Consejeria de Innovacion, Ciencia y Empresa de la Junta de Andalucia
  2. FONDECYT [1110235]
  3. Operational Programme of the European Social Fund of Andalusia
  4. INIA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis of the osmoregulatory properties and associated energy metabolism of euryhaline flatfish species that are cultured in the world. Culture of flatfish (pleuronectiformes) requires stage- and species-dependent osmotic conditions for rearing. Additionally, geographic origin of broodstock animals is another factor to be taken into account for the culture of pleuronectiformes. Larval and juvenile stages of many flatfish species are cultured in large nurseries situated in estuaries and shallow marine habitats, where the environmental salinity is close to the iso-osmotic point of their internal milieu. This fact implicates an advantage in terms of energy savings for osmoregulatory purposes. Thus, this saved' energy can be derived to other physiological processes, such as somatic growth. However, this scientific presumption does not always results in an optimal growth for many flatfish species. Indeed, iso-osmotic culture conditions can evoke a higher allostatic load than that in the usual hyper-osmotic environment where flatfish species live wildly. Optimization of flatfish culture thus requires adjustments of the osmotic culture conditions to the specific osmoregulatory and metabolic demands that eventually determine the allostatic load and consequently condition growth rates. In this sense, the geographical location of aquaculture farms and the osmoregulatory-based selection of the species to be cultivated in a particular area become critical factors to be considered for optimal flatfish culture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据