4.5 Article

Biomonitoring of the river pufferfish, Takifugu obscurus in aquaculture at different rearing densities using stress-related genes

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 12, 页码 1835-1846

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03189.x

关键词

Takifugu obscurus; aquaculture; growth; biomarker; stress-related genes; rearing density

资金

  1. INHA University
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea
  3. Korean Government (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology) [NRF-2009-351-1-C00072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The river pufferfish Takifugu obscurus is one of the most valuable aquaculture species in South Korea and China. To analyse the effect of rearing densities in the aquaculture of this species, we performed an experiment where T. obscurus was reared for 3months after hatching at different initial rearing densities (10 fishL(-1), 20 fishL(-1), and 25 fishL(-1)) which are similar to rearing densities in aquaculture (10-15 fishL(-1)). The growth of the high density group (25 fishL(-1)) was significantly slower than that of the low density group. To determine biomarkers for stress under conditions of high rearing density, we chose six stress-related genes (heat shock proteins (HSPs) 70 and 90, metallothionein (MT), cytochrome P450 1A (CYP1A), glucocorticoid receptor (GCR) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and evaluated their expression by real-time reverse transcript polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR). In the high density group, we observed significant up-regulation of genes encoding HSPs 70 and 90, MT, CYP1A, and PEPCK in liver and brain, but no up-regulation of the GCR. In particular, expression of HSP70, MT and CYP1A was up-regulated in a tissue-specific pattern. Our results demonstrate that growth retardation at high initial rearing densities is associated with stress-induced gene expression. These findings further indicate that molecular biomarkers can be useful to determine the optimal rearing conditions with respect to densities of pufferfish culture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据