4.5 Article

Effects of differently processed diets on growth, immunity and water quality of the sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka, 1867)

期刊

AQUACULTURE NUTRITION
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 382-389

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2012.00974.x

关键词

Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka; 1867); feed processing method; growth; immunity; water quality

资金

  1. National Key Technology R&D Programme in the 12th 5 years Plan of China [2011BAD13B02]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41106134]
  3. National Marine Public Welfare Research Project [200805069]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20080431222]
  5. Agricultural Seed Project of Shandong Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The type of formulated diet used in aquaculture systems affects the feed efficiency and water quality. In this study, the water quality, growth performance and immunity of the sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka, 1867), fed diets produced using four different processing methods (extruded pellet diet, cold-bonded pellet diet, flake diet and mash diet) were quantified for 60days to identify the optimal feed type for culturing of this species. Sea cucumbers grew faster, the feed conversion ratio was much lower, and immunity indicators were higher when fed the extruded pellet diet compared to the other diets. Sea cucumbers fed the extruded pellet diet had the highest specific growth rate (0.96), whereas A.japonicus fed the cold-bonded pellet diet had the lowest specific growth rate (0.51). The lysozyme activity of sea cucumbers fed the extruded pellet diet was higher (57.52) than that of A.japonicus fed the cold-bonded pellet diet (39.22), flake diet (37.32) and mash diet (32.68). When animals were fed the mash diet, the ammonianitrogen, nitritenitrogen and phosphate productions were higher than in animals fed the other diets. These results indicate that the extruded pellet diet is the optimum feed type for use in the culture of A.japonicus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据