4.5 Article

A study on dietary l-lysine requirement of juvenile yellow catfish Pelteobagrus fulvidraco

期刊

AQUACULTURE NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 35-45

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00874.x

关键词

feed utilization; growth performance; juvenile yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco); l-lysine requirement

资金

  1. State Spark Plan Project of 'Comprehensive Development and Utilization of Safe Feed Additives for Healthy and Environment-friendly Aquaculture' [2007EA780011]
  2. Guangdong Science and Technology Research Project of 'The Development of Micro-capsules of Crystalline Amino Acids and its Application in Aquaculture Feed' [2007A0201000052]
  3. Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An 8-week feeding trial was conducted to determine lysine requirement of juvenile yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) by feeding formulated diets containing crystalline l-lysine. Six isonitrogenous and isoenergetic diets (405 g kg-1 protein, 18 kJ g-1 gloss energy) containing fish meal together with soybean protein concentrate as protein sources and fish oil together with soybean oil as lipid sources were formulated. Crystalline l-lysine was added into the six diets to acquire lysine concentrations of 17.3, 21.8, 26.0, 31.3, 35.5 and 41.9 g kg-1 dry diets, respectively. Mixture of crystalline amino acid was supplemented to simulate the amino acid profile in muscle of yellow catfish. The results indicated that final body weight (FBW), weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR), feed efficiency (FE) and protein efficiency (PE) increased with the increase in dietary lysine level from 17.3 to 31.3 g kg-1 of diet and then decreased as the dietary lysine levels further increased. No significant difference in survival rate was found among all the dietary treatments. One-slope, quadratic broken-line analysis on the basis of SGR showed that the dietary l-lysine requirement of juvenile yellow catfish was 33.1 g kg-1 of dry diet (83.2 g kg-1 of dietary protein).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据