4.7 Article

The toxicity of the anti-sea lice pesticide AlphaMax® to the polychaete worm Nereis virens

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 430, 期 -, 页码 98-106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.03.044

关键词

Deltamethrin; Pyrethroid; Polychaetes; Sublethal exposure; Sediment

资金

  1. NSERC Canadian Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture Network [NETGP 372815-08]
  2. Program for Aquaculture Regulatory Research, Department of Fisheries and Oceans

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polychaete worms have been suggested as a commercially valuable, extractive species to use in Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) to remove organic materials (fish feces) released from salmon aquaculture. However, pesticides used to control parasitic sea lice infestations on salmon are also released from fish farms and non-target organisms may be exposed to these chemicals. In laboratory studies, the polychaete Nereis virens was exposed via water and sediment to the anti-sea lice pesticide AlphaMax (R) (active ingredient, deltamethrin). Worms exposed in water for 48 h exhibited mortality and impaired mobility in up to 100% of organisms, only at greater than 2-times the prescribed aquaculture treatment concentration. This would suggest negligible risk to worms from acute environmental exposure to AlphaMax (R) in water. Low mortality (<= 20%) occurred in 7- or 30-d tests with sand or sediment spiked at relatively high concentrations (up to 0.72 mu g deltamethrin/g), but sublethal effects related to burrowing behavior and worm condition were observed at concentrations as low as 11 mu g/g. Therefore, the long-term survival, growth, and ability of worms to perform their ecosystem function of processing organic waste could be affected, depending on the extent of deltamethrin accumulation in sediment. Environmental concentrations of deltamethrin in sediment near aquaculture sites are not presently known and are needed to assess risk to non-target organisms. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据