4.7 Article

Feeding, metabolism and growth in response to temperature in juveniles of the Australasian sea cucumber, Australostichopus mollis

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 358, 期 -, 页码 92-97

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.06.024

关键词

Australostichopus mollis; Sea cucumber; Temperature; Aquaculture; Metabolism; Growth

资金

  1. University of Auckland in New Zealand
  2. Glenn Family Foundation
  3. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica of Chile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study the importance of seawater temperature for the food intake, food utilization and growth of aquacultured juveniles of the Australasian sea cucumber, Australostichopus mollis, was examined. The juveniles (16.5 +/- 0.5 g, wet weight) were experimentally exposed to four seawater temperatures (15, 18, 21, and 24 degrees C) for 105 days, during which they were fed mussel waste, a highly effective natural food source, that is utilised by sea cucumbers under co-culture conditions beneath mussel farms. At each temperature treatment the feeding, metabolism, growth and survival of the juveniles were evaluated. Overall, the sea cucumbers responded negatively to an increase of temperature from 15 to 21 degrees C with decreased food intake, and growth rates, and elevated metabolism. The survival of juveniles was compromised when held at 24 degrees C. Most importantly, the food conversion efficiency of juveniles at 15 degrees C was over seven times greater than for those growing at 21 degrees C which was reflected in the growth rates (i.e., 0.71 +/- 0.05% d(-1) versus 0.28 +/- 0.05% d(-1)). The results of this study suggest that consideration of ambient temperature regimes will be a critical factor for the selection of suitable aquaculture locations for A. mollis due to the risk of mortality at higher temperatures (>= 24 degrees C) and markedly improved growth and food utilization at lower temperatures around 15 degrees C. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据