4.7 Article

Growth of juvenile Atlantic cod Gadus morhua in land-based recirculation systems: Effects of feeding regime, photoperiod and diet

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 292, 期 3-4, 页码 225-231

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.04.028

关键词

Diet; Feed conversion; Feeding regime; Growth; Photoperiod; Recirculation system

资金

  1. New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combined effect of feeding regime and photoperiod on the growth of juvenile Atlantic cod Gadus morhua in land-based recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) was examined using three different commercial diets. Fish of 8-10 g were reared in 1 m(3) tanks at an initial density of 10 kg m(-3) for 78 d. Three RAS units were used to simultaneously test three feed/photoperiod regimes that might be encountered in the wild or aquaculture; LightDark (LD) 24:0, LD12:11 (+1 h crepuscular periods) and LD6:6 (+12 h crepuscular periods). Feed was administered during the light period every 30 min for a 3 min feeding duration. In each RAS unit three diets (A, B and Q were tested, which were broadly similar in composition but from different manufacturers. Water exchange rate averaged 10-19% in the three recirculation systems, and key water quality parameters such as NH4+ and CO2 remained at low effect concentrations (<0.4 and <3 mg L-1, respectively). Final stocking densities were 45-60 kg m(-3). There was a significant influence of both feed/photoperiod regime and diet on specific growth rate (SGR). Fish receiving the LD12:11 and LD6:6 regimes and Diet A grew best (SGR 2.59 and 2.54% d(-1) respectively). Fish fed Diet B and C also grew best under the LD12:11 and LD6:6 feed/photoperiod regimes (SGR range of 2.41-2.46% d(-1)). Conversely, fish kept in the LD24:0 feed/photoperiod regime grew relatively slowly irrespective of diet type (SGR range of 2.26-2.32% d(-1)). The feed conversion performance of the feed/photoperiod regimes and diets followed the same pattern. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据