4.7 Article

Effectiveness of freshwater treatment against Lepeophtheirus simplex (Copepoda: Caligidae) and Neobenedenia sp (Monogenea: Capsalidae), skin parasites of bullseye puffer fish, Sphoeroides annulatus reared in tanks

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 284, 期 1-4, 页码 277-280

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.027

关键词

Lepeophtheirus simplex; Neobenedenia sp.; Freshwater treatments; Sphoeroides annulatus

资金

  1. Fondo Sectorial de Investigacion en Materia Agricola, Pecuaria, Acuacultura, Agrobiotecnologia y Recursos Filogeneticos [SAGARPA-2003-73]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concurrent infections provoked by the sea lice Lepeophtheirus simplex and the monogenean Neobenedenia sp. on bullseye puffer fish Sphoeroides annulatus, reared in tanks, have been related to skin pathology and mortality. Freshwater treatment is widely used to treat two parasite groups, but the results differ depending on the parasite species, life stage and exposure time. The present study describes the effectiveness of freshwater treatments to remove both parasites. Sea lice nauplii and free swimming copepodids, reared in the laboratory, were exposed to freshwater treatments for periods from 30 s to 16 min. Fish experimentally infected with sea lice or monogeneans were exposed to freshwater for 15 to 90 min and 10 to 60 min, respectively. All sea lice nauplii and copepodids were killed by freshwater dips at 2.5 and 14 min, respectively. For pre-adult and adult sea lice, 30 and 60 min of freshwater exposure significantly reduced up to 95 and 99% respectively. However. most freshwater exposures did not reduce chalimus stages more than 10%. Immature and adult populations of monogeneans showed a significant reduction of 95% at 20 min of exposure. These results indicate that, if used properly, freshwater baths constitute an efficient alternative to control these mixed ectoparasite infections on bullseye puffer fish reared in tanks. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据