4.7 Article

Analysis of the experimental behaviour of a 100 kWth latent heat storage system for direct steam generation in solar thermal power plants

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 30, 期 17-18, 页码 2643-2651

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.07.011

关键词

Thermal storage; Phase change material; Latent heat; EG/PCM sandwich configuration; Direct steam generation; Solar thermal power plants; High temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A latent heat thermal storage prototype was tested under real working conditions with steam produced by a parabolic-trough collector test facility at the Plataforma Solar de Almeria. The prototype contained KNO3/NaNO3 eutectic mixture as phase change material (PCM) and expanded graphite fins arranged in a sandwich configuration for improving thermal conductivity. In this paper, experimental data such as steam quality, PCM temperature distribution, stored/delivered energy and thermal power have been analyzed for a selected day. A mismatch between steam quality results and the corresponding PCM temperature/time curves has been observed. Furthermore, it has been noted that stored/delivered energy and the resulting thermal power are 40 kW(th)h and 50 kW(th), respectively, and hence, lower than the expected from design parameters. The reasons for these deviations seem to be deficient thermal insulation at the top of the prototype, use of working conditions other than design, and also thermal inertia introduced by excess PCM mass. In this paper, we also demonstrate the applicability of the quasi static model for describing the general performance of a latent thermal energy storage module with a sandwich configuration. In our particular case, the model fits the experimental data quite well when 8 W/mK is taken as the storage medium thermal conductivity. However, for a more accurate description, a sensible heat exchange term should be introduced in the model. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据