4.6 Article

Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) of Heavy Metal Ions at the Sub-Parts per Million Level in Water

期刊

APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY
卷 66, 期 12, 页码 1385-1396

出版社

SOC APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY
DOI: 10.1366/12-06639R

关键词

LIBS; Heavy metal; Pre-concentration; Water-quality analysis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0009376, 2011-0003238]
  2. Anti-Corrosion Research Center at Mokpo National University
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0009376] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a simple sub parts per million (sub-ppm) detection method for heavy metals in water by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Filter papers were used as the substrates for both transforming aqueous solutions to solid samples and for pre-concentrating dissolved heavy metal ions. The amount of sample uptake was 1.2 g by soaking a filter paper. This provides limit-of-detection (LOD) values of 2.7 and 0.36 ppm for Pb and Cr, respectively. The LODs could be improved remarkably by pre-concentrating the heavy metal ions. When a 40 g sample solution was evaporated on a filter paper, the LODs of 75 and 18 parts per billion (ppb) were obtained for Pb and Cr, respectively. Moreover, by either increasing the evaporated amount of sample solution or applying an argon gas flow, further improvement of the LODs was found to be very promising. The LIBS spectra of tap water were recorded using the pre-concentration method and are discussed in comparison with the results from inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). We could observe strong emission lines of Ca, Mg, K, Cu, and Sr in the tap water, of which concentrations were determined to be 6.3, 1.3, 1.1, 0.64, and 0.046 ppm, respectively, by ICP-AES. Our method shows promise as a fast, reliable, water-quality monitoring tool for heavy-metal concentrations as well as for hardness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据