4.6 Article

Design of a Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy System for On-Line Quality Analysis of Pulverized Coal in Power Plants

期刊

APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY
卷 63, 期 8, 页码 865-872

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1366/000370209788964458

关键词

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; LIBS; Pulverized coal; Sampling equipment; High-pressure gas cleaning device; Proximate analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10574084, 60678003]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Taiyuan [07010715]
  3. Shanxi Province Foundation for Returned Overseas Scholars
  4. Haitong Automation Technique Ltd
  5. Institute of Coal Chemistry (ICC)
  6. [2006CB921603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is vitally important for a power plant to determine the chemical composition of coal prior to combustion in order to obtain optimal boiler control. In this work, a fully software-controlled laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) system comprising a LIBS apparatus and sampling equipment has been designed for possible application to power plants for on-line quality analysis of pulverized coal. Special attention was given to the LIBS system, the data processing methods (especially the normalization with Bode Rule/DC Level) and the specific settings (the software-controlled triggering source, high-pressure gas cleaning device, samplepreparation module, sampling module, etc.), which gave the best direct measurement for C, H, Si, Na, Mg, Fe, At, and Ti with measurement errors less than 10% for pulverized coal. Therefore, the apparatus is accurate enough to be applied to industries for on-line monitoring of pulverized coal. The method of proximate analysis was also introduced and the experimental error of A(ad) (Ash, 'ad' is an abbreviation for 'air dried') was shown in the range of 2.29 to 13.47%. The programmable logic controller (PLC) controlled on-line coal sampling equipment, which is designed based upon aerodynamics, and is capable of performing multipoint sampling and sample-preparation operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据