4.6 Article

Patterns of earthworm communities and species traits in relation to the perturbation gradient of a restored floodplain

期刊

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 87-95

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.03.015

关键词

Earthworms; Biodiversity; Flooding; Species traits; Bioindicator; River restoration

资金

  1. Competence Centre Environment and Sustainability of the ETH Domain (CCES) from the Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0-116825]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about the diversity and ecology of earthworms in flocdplains, as well as their response to natural and anthropic perturbations (e.g. floods, river channelisation, floodplain restoration). We characterised the patterns of earthworm communities and species traits in the different habitats of a lowland restored floodplain in Switzerland. In addition to classical species-based metrics, such as species richness and Shannon diversity, species traits were used to calculate the community weighted means (CWMs) of traits and functional dispersion (FDis). We hypothesised that trait-based metrics would reveal clearer patterns than classical approaches. The distribution of earthworm traits varied among habitats in relation to changes in flooding frequency: poorly developed gravel bar soils most exposed to flooding were characterised by high abundance of small epigeic species and low abundance of large anecic species. Differences in anecic and endogeic earthworm community structure matched flood frequency. In agreement with our hypothesis, CWMs were more strongly correlated to environmental variables than species composition, diversity, or functional diversity. Based on these results, the ratio of the relative abundances of epigeic and anecic species, and the differences in species composition within anecic and endogeic ecological types of earthworms were identified as indicators of soil development in floodplains. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据