4.7 Article

Adaptive self-constructing fuzzy neural network controller for hardware implementation of an inverted pendulum system

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 3962-3975

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.02.025

关键词

Self-constructing fuzzy neural network; Rule elimination; Rule generation; Adaptive control; Mahalanobis distance; Linear induction motor; Inverted pendulum

资金

  1. National Science Council, Republic of China [NSC 97-2221-E-036-025]
  2. Tatung University, Taipei, Taiwan [B98-E03-060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A tracking control of a real inverted pendulum system is implemented in this paper via an adaptive self-constructing fuzzy neural network (ASCFNN) controller. The linear induction motor (LIM) has many excellent performances, such as the silence, high-speed operation and high-starting thrust force, fewer losses and size of motion devices. Therefore, the experiment is implemented by integrating the LIM and an inverted pendulum (IP) system. The ASCFNN controller is composed of an ASCFNN identifier, a computation controller and a robust controller. The ASCFNN identifier is used to estimate parameters of the real IP system and the computational controller is used to sum up the outputs of the ASCFNN identifier. In order to compensate the uncertainties of the system parameters and achieve robust stability of the considered system, the robust controller is adopted. Furthermore, the structure and parameter learning are designed in the ASCFNN identifier to achieve favorable approximation performance. The Mahalanobis distance (M-distance) method in the structure learning is also employed to determine if the fuzzy rules are generated/eliminated or not. Concurrently, the adaptive laws are derived based on the sense of Lyapunov so that the stability of the system can be guaranteed. Finally, the simulation and the actual experiment are implemented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed ASCFNN controller. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据