4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinomas using [11C]acetate and [18F]FDG PET/CT: A preliminary study

期刊

APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES
卷 67, 期 7-8, 页码 1195-1198

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.02.011

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); [C-11]acetate; F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([F-18]FDG); Integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that [F-18]FDG PET has a low sensitivity in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We prospectively compared [C-11]acetate PET/CT results with those of [F-18]FDG PET/CT in patients with HCCs. Thirteen patients (M:F = 11:2, mean age of 51 +/- 12) with suspicious or confirmed HCCs underwent [C-11]acetate PET/CT with or without [F-18]FDC; PET/CT (both [C-11]acetate and [F-18]FDG PET/CT were performed in 10 patients). HCC was confirmed by histopathology or clinical criteria in 12 patients and one benign liver lesion. Both PET/CT images were interpreted by two experienced nuclear physicians, supported by standardized uptake value (SUV). A total of 12 patients were confirmed to have initial or recurrent HCCs. [F-18]FDG PET/CT showed markedly increased uptake in only two patients, moderately increased uptake in another two and negative in six. [C-11]acetate PET/CT demonstrated markedly increased uptake in seven patients, moderately increased uptake in three and negative in only two. One HCC metastatic lesion was detected only by [C-11]acetate PET/CT. For detection of HCC, [C-11]acetate PET/CT showed a high sensitivity of 83%, whereas [F-18]FDG PET/CT only of 40%. The study results demonstrated that [F-18]FDG PET/CT has a limitation in detection of HCC and [C-11]acetate PET/CT has a complementary role to [F-18]FDG PET/CT. When primary HCC showed low [F-18]FDG uptake, it was [C-11]acetate-avid, and vice versa. It may be useful to combine both [F-18]FDG and [C-11]acetate PET/CT for detection of HCCs. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据