4.7 Article

Microbial community and function of enrichment cultures with methane and toluene

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 98, 期 7, 页码 3121-3131

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5297-8

关键词

Toluene; CH4 oxidation; Methanotrophs; Enriched consortia; Toluene-degrading bacteria

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41001148, 51178411, 41371012]
  2. Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [LR13E080002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012QNA6006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction effect of co-existence of toluene and CH4 on community and activity of methanotrophs and toluene-degrading bacteria was characterized in three consortia enriched with CH4 and toluene (MT), toluene (T), and CH4 (M), respectively, in this study. The CH4 oxidation activity in the enrichment culture of MT was significantly lower than that of M at the end of the experiment (P = 0.001). The toluene degradation rate could be enhanced by continuous addition of CH4 and toluene in the initial days, but it was inhibited in the later days. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA genes showed that Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were dominant in the three enriched consortia, but the community of methanotrophs and toluene-degrading bacteria was significantly affected by the co-existence of CH4 and toluene. Both Methylosinus (91.8 %) and Methylocystis (8.2 %) were detected in the enrichment culture of MT, while only Methylocystis species were detected in M. The toluene-degrading bacteria including Burkholderia, Flavobacteria, Microbacterium, and Azoarcus were all detected in the enrichment culture of T. However, only Azoarcus was found in the enrichment culture of MT. Significantly higher contents of extracellular polymeric substances polysaccharose and protein in the enrichment culture of MT than that of T and M suggested that a higher environmental stress occurred in the enrichment culture of MT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据