4.7 Article

A comparison of two 16S rRNA gene-based PCR primer sets in unraveling anammox bacteria from different environmental samples

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 97, 期 24, 页码 10521-10529

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5305-z

关键词

Anammox; Detection; Diversity; PCR primer; Abundance; Distribution

资金

  1. The University of Hong Kong
  2. Hong Kong GRC GRF [HKU_701913]
  3. Leaderman & Associates in Taipei
  4. Environmental and Conservation Fund [15/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two 16S rRNA gene-based PCR primer sets (Brod541F/Amx820R and A438f/A684r) for detecting anammox bacteria were compared using sediments from Mai Po wetlands (MP), the South China Sea (SCS), a freshwater reservoir (R2), and sludge granules from a wastewater treatment plant (A2). By comparing their ability in profiling anammox bacteria, the recovered diversity, community structure, and abundance of anammox bacteria among all these diverse samples indicated that A438f/A684r performed better than Brod541F/Amx820R in retrieving anammox bacteria from these different environmental samples. Five Scalindua subclusters (zhenghei-I, SCS-I, SCS-III, arabica, and brodae) dominated in SCS whereas two Scalindua subclusters (zhenghei-II and wagneri) and one cluster of Kuenenia dominated in MP. R2 showed a higher diversity of anammox bacteria with two new retrieved clusters (R2-New-1 and R2-New-2), which deserves further detailed study. The dominance of Brocadia in sample A2 was supported by both of the primer sets used. Results collectively indicate strongly niche-specific community structures of anammox bacteria in different environments, and A438f/A684r is highly recommended for screening anammox bacteria from various environments when dealing with a collection of samples with diverse physiochemical characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据