4.7 Article

A carrier fusion significantly induces unfolded protein response in heterologous protein production by Aspergillus oryzae

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 92, 期 6, 页码 1197-1206

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3487-9

关键词

Aspergillus oryzae; Heterologous protein production; Carrier; UPR; ER

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23380047] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In heterologous protein production by filamentous fungi, target proteins are expressed as fusions with homologous secretory proteins, called carriers, for higher production yields. Although carrier fusion is thought to overcome the bottleneck in transcriptional and (post)translational processes during heterologous protein production, there is limited knowledge of its physiological effects on the host strain. In this study, we performed DNA microarray analysis by comparing gene expression patterns of two Aspergillus oryzae strains expressing either carrier- or non-carrier-fused bovine chymosin (CHY). When CHY was expressed as a fusion with alpha-amylase (AmyB), the production level increased by approximately 2-fold as compared with the non-carrier-fused CHY. DNA microarray analysis revealed that the carrier fusion significantly up-regulated many genes involved in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein-folding and secretion. Consistently, hacA transcripts were efficiently spliced in the strain expressing the carrier-fused CHY, indicating an unfolded protein response (UPR). The carrier-fused CHY was detected intracellularly without processing at the Kex2 cleavage site, which is likely recognized in the Golgi, and the carrier fusion delayed extracellular CHY production in the early growth phase as compared with the non-carrier-fused expression. Taken together, our data suggest a proposal that the carrier fusion temporarily accumulates the carrier-fused CHY in the ER and significantly induces UPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据