4.7 Article

Characterization of a novel dye-linked L-proline dehydrogenase from an aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon, Pyrobaculum calidifontis

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 1075-1082

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2914-7

关键词

L-Proline dehydrogenase; FAD containing amino acid dehydrogenase; Hyperthermophilic archaeon; Pyrobaculum calidifontis

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18380060]
  2. Japan Foundation of Applied Enzymology
  3. Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18380060] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activity of a dye-linked l-proline dehydrogenase (dye-l-proDH) was found in the crude extract of an aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon, Pyrobaculum calidifontis JCM 11548, and was purified 163-fold through four sequential chromatography steps. The enzyme has a molecular mass of about 108 kDa and is a homodimer with a subunit molecular mass of about 46 kDa. The enzyme retained more than 90% of its activity after incubation at 100 A degrees C for 120 min (pH 7.5) or after incubation at pHs 4.5-9.0 for 30 min at 50 A degrees C. The enzyme catalyzed l-proline dehydrogenation to Delta(1)-pyroline-5-carboxylate using 2,6-dichloroindophenol (DCIP) as the electron acceptor and the Michaelis constants for l-proline and DCIP were 1.67 and 0.026 mM, respectively. The prosthetic group on the enzyme was identified as flavin adenine dinucleotide by high-performance liquid chromatography. The subunit N-terminal amino acid sequence was MYDYVVVGAG. Using that sequence and previously reported genome information, the gene encoding the enzyme (Pcal_1655) was identified. The gene was then cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli and found to encode a polypeptide of 415 amino acids with a calculated molecular weight of 46,259. The dye-l-proDH gene cluster in P. calidifontis inherently differs from those in the other hyperthermophiles reported so far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据