4.8 Article

Kinetics of coal char gasification with CO2: Impact of internal/external diffusion at high temperature and elevated pressure

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 299-307

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.011

关键词

Coal char; CO2 gasification; Kinetics; Reaction rate; Pressurized wire-heating reactor

资金

  1. Power Generation & Electricity Delivery Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20131010101810]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20131010101810] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pressurized wire-heating reactor (PWHR) that can provide experimental conditions up to pressures and temperatures of 50 atm and 1750 K, respectively, was developed to evaluate the intrinsic reaction kinetics of CO2 gasification for Berau sub-bituminous coal char (Indonesian coal) at elevated pressure using a synchronized experimental method. This synchronization system consists of a thermocouple wire for both heating and direct measurement of the particle temperature and a photodetector sensor for measuring the intensity of the luminous emission from the reaction particle to determine the ignition/burnout points. The intrinsic reaction kinetics obtained from PWHR, which was analyzed from nth order reaction rate equations, was verified by comparison with TGA results. The internal/external effectiveness factor was analyzed to determine the effects of high pressure (up to 30 atm) and temperature (up to 1723 K) on char-CO2 gasification. Accordingly, the intrinsic activation energies based on nth order reaction rate equation were determined to be 152 kJ/mol (via TGA, 75 mu m char particle), 150 kJ/mol (via TGA, 800 mu m char particle), and 149.2 kJ/mol (via PWHR, 800 mu m char particle). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据