4.8 Article

Physical degradation of cathode catalyst layer: A major contributor to accelerated water flooding in long-term operation of DMFCs

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 346-353

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.016

关键词

Direct methanol fuel cell; Membrane electrode assembly; Durability; Catalyst layer cracking; Cathode flooding

资金

  1. Korean Ministry of Knowledge Economy through the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [2011-30300-30010]
  2. Korea CCS R&D Center (KCRC) - Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012-0008931]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a comprehensive investigation on the water flooding of direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) during long-term testing with regard to the structural changes of the catalyst layer and gas diffusion layer (GDL) of the cathode. Two separate durability operations of DMFCs are conducted for 1000 and 1261 h in order to determine the relative contributions of the cathode catalyst layer and the GDL to time-dependent water flooding during the aging process. The voltage decay rates caused by flooding and non-flooding degradation phenomena are calculated and compared. DMFCs undergo serious voltage decay due to water accumulation in the cathode, and the rate of flooding degradation multiplies approximately every 500 h during the duration of testing. The cathode catalyst layer is found to be severely deformed due to surface wrinkling and cracking during the aging of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). The morphological alteration of the cathode catalyst layer, particularly the formation of wide and deep cracks is identified as the main reason for the acceleration of water flooding, while degradation of the cathode GDL is minor. This demonstrates that during the long-term operation of DMFCs, the physical disintegration of the cathode catalyst layer is a crucial issue affecting water management, which should be carefully addressed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据