4.8 Article

Chemical looping combustion of ultra low concentration of methane with Fe2O3/Al2O3 and CuO/SiO2

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 1916-1923

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.005

关键词

Chemical looping combustion; Ultra low concentration methane; Fe2O3/Al2O3; CuO/SiO2

资金

  1. University of Newcastle (Australia)
  2. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC)
  3. Xstrata Coal Research Limited

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the performance of two metal oxide species in oxidizing ultra low concentration of methane (below 1% in volume). The focus on low methane concentrations are driven by its practical importance in applications such as abatement of ventilation air methane (VAM) in mining operations. Two mixed metal oxides, Fe2O3/Al2O3 and CuO/SiO2, were selected as oxygen carriers and prepared using dry impregnation method. The metal oxide loading contents are found to be 45 wt% and 48 wt%, respectively. The redox reactivity of the selected oxygen carriers were studied at various methane concentrations (i.e., 0.1%, 0.5% and 1% in volume) and temperatures between 873 K and 1073 K using a thermogravimetric analyzer. At low methane concentrations and low temperatures (below 1073 K) the conversion of Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 showed higher reduction reactivity than the reduction of CuO to Cu. The redox reactivity of Fe2O3/Al2O3 was also found to be quite stable even after 60 redox cycles at 1073 K. The respective weight percentages for oxidation and reduction were found to be 100% and 96.67%, corresponding to a full oxidized state Fe2O3 and a reduced state between Fe3O4 and FeO respectively. Moreover, the results for the global reactivity of reduction and oxidation (calculated at X = 0.5) showed that the reduction rates were temperature and concentration dependent, varying from 0.14%/s to 2.2%/s over the range of temperatures and methane concentrations of interest. The oxidation rates were much higher than their reduction counterpart. The values varied from 8.95%/s at 873 K to 10.65% at 1073 K. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据