4.7 Article

pH sensitive halloysite-sodium hyaluronate/poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) nanocomposites for colon cancer drug delivery

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 97-98, 期 -, 页码 33-42

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.06.002

关键词

Halloysite; Biocompatible; Hydrogel; pH sensitive; Colon cancer; Drug delivery

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea (Acceleration Research program) [2009-0078791]
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea Pioneer Research Center Program [2010-0019308/2010-0019482]
  3. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea Brain Korea 21 Plus Program [21A2013800002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A safe and efficient halloysite-nanocomposite hydrogel for colon cancer drug delivery was synthesized using biocompatible and biodegradable materials composed of sodium hyaluronate with poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Fourier-transform infra-red spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and scanning electron microscopy were performed to confirm the formation, crystallinity, thermal and morphological properties of the nanocomposite hydrogel. The hydrogels exhibited good swelling properties in a pH sensitive manner. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), an anticancer drug, was encapsulated successfully into these hydrogels as well as inside the halloysite nanotubes through equilibrium swelling followed by pulling and breaking the vacuum. Transmission electron microscopy showed that 5-FU was also encapsulated in the halloysite nanotubes. In vitro release experiments were performed at 37 degrees C in stimulated gastric fluid (pH 1.2) for 2 h followed by stimulated intestinal medium (pH 7.4). It was found that the release of 5-FU from nanocomposite hydrogels followed pH-dependent controlled release as compared to that of conventional hydrogels. From the in vitro release studies it was found that the nanocomposite hydrogels are more efficient for colon cancer drug delivery. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据