4.8 Article

TiO2 mediated heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of moxifloxacin: Operational variables and scavenger study

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 150-156

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.09.029

关键词

Heterogeneous photocatalysis; Process parameters; Fluoroquinolone; Scavenger; Antibiotics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UV-A (485 mu W cm(-2)) TiO2-P25 mediated heterogeneous photocatalysis is investigated as an advanced oxidation technology for the removal of the fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotic moxifloxacin (MOX) in aqueous solution. The goal of this work is twofold. First, the degradation kinetics are investigated by changing operational conditions during the degradation reaction. The effect of the initial MOX concentration (12.5-124.6 mu mol L-1), catalyst concentration (0.25-8.00 g L-1), changing the oxygen concentration (0%, 20%, 100%) in the inlet gas flow (60 mL min(-1)) and temperature (278-338 K) on the photocatalytic degradation rate is investigated. An optimal MOX degradation is attained at a catalyst concentration of 5 g L-1, 298 K and air sparging at 60 mL min(-1) resulting in an initial degradation rate of 16.2 +/- 0.3 mu mol L-1 min(-1) and a half-life time of t(1/2) = 1.6 min. Secondly, the aim is to gain a deeper insight of the photocatalytic degradation mechanism of MOX. Therefore an estimation of the participation of the different reactive species during the photocatalytic degradation of MOX is done using two scavengers in different concentrations. The role of hydroxyl radicals is monitored using isopropanol, and the participation of oxidative holes in the reaction mechanism is evaluated by the addition of iodine anions. The scavenger study indicates that holes are the dominant reactive species, contributing up to 63%, and that hydroxyl radicals participate for about 24% in the photocatalytic degradation of MOX. Reactive oxygen species created by conduction band electrons are probably of lower importance, <13%, during the photocatalytic degradation reaction of MOX. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据