4.6 Article

Light alkane dehydrogenation over mesoporous Cr2O3/Al2O3 catalysts

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 389, 期 1-2, 页码 155-164

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.09.013

关键词

Chromia-alumina; Alkane dehydrogenation; Catalyst deactivation; Diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (DRIFT); Raman; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS); UV-vis (ultra violet visible)

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Light alkane dehydrogenation was investigated over a series of mesoporous Cr2O3/Al2O3 catalysts containing 2-15 wt.% chromia, synthesized via the supramolecular templating technique. The catalysts were characterized by N-2 adsorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), UV-vis (ultra violet visible), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and temperature programmed reduction (TPR). Depending on chromia loading, chromium was found to be present essentially as two surface species, each possessing one short terminal Cr=O bond and polymeric species. UV-vis and XPS studies revealed that the surface chromium occurs in two chemical states as Cr(III) and Cr(VI) species. Investigation of ethane and propane adsorption by in situ diffuse reflectance FTIR spectroscopy (DRIFT) revealed the formation of adsorbed acetaldehyde, acetone, formate and acetate. During the dehydrogenation reaction, acetate/carboxylate and hydrocarbon species were detected. Under otherwise the same conditions, the alkane dehydrogenation activity increased with increasing chromia loading. The activity of regenerated catalysts was found to be lower than the corresponding fresh catalysts, suggesting that the deactivation is partly permanent. Detailed characterization studies of spent and regenerated catalysts indicated that the formation of subsurface Cr(III) species during dehydrogenation may be the reason for the permanently lost activity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据