4.6 Article

Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane over chromium-loaded calcium-hydroxyapatite

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 356, 期 2, 页码 201-210

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.01.005

关键词

Chromium catalysts; Hydroxyapatite; Propane ODH; TPR; XPS; UV-vis

资金

  1. French Ministere des Affaires Etrangeres [MA/07/167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromium-loaded hydroxyapatite catalysts Cr(x)/CaHAp (0.1 <= x <= 3.7 wt.% Cr) were prepared by ion-exchange and characterized by several techniques including FTIR, Raman, XPS, UV-vis-NIR spectroscopies, EPR, DRX and TPR. After calcination in air, several isolated chromium species were identified: (i) surface Cr3+ ions in distorted octahedral symmetry, (ii) bulk octahedral Cr3+ ions, (iii) octahedral Cr5+ ions in low concentration and (iv) Cr6+ ions. Cr6+ ions present as monochromates are predominant only at very low loadings (x <= 0.1 wt.% Cr) whereas, at higher Cr amounts (up to 3.7 wt.% Cr), Cr3+ species are preponderant. The majority of Cr3+ ions are located on the apatite surface; they do not form Cr2O3 crystallites but isolated Cr3+-O-Ca2+ or Cr3+-O-Cr3+ entities at the highest Cr amounts. The Cr(x)/CaHAp catalysts were tested in propane oxidative dehydrogenation in the 300-550 C temperature range. The Cr6+ centres initially present on the catalysts may initiate the cracking of propane because of their acidity and improve the conversion: however, as they are reduced by the reaction mixture, the propane conversion decreases upon running at 550 C.Cr2+ ions are also formed upon running. Isolated Cr3+ species are believed to be responsible for the propylene formation (propylene yield around 7% at 550 C). This limitation of performance is ascribed to the decrease of the basicity induced by the fixation of Cr3+ which counterbalances the positive effect of chromium on oxygen reactivity. The proposed mechanism involves the contribution of oxygen vacancies or Cr2+ species. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据