4.8 Article

Antibacterial Coatings on Titanium Surfaces: A Comparison Study Between in Vitro Single-Species and Multispecies Biofilm

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 5992-6001

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00402

关键词

single biofilm; multispecies biofilm; antibacterial coatings; titanium; hLf1-11; immobilization; silver electrodeposition; TESPSA silanization

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) of the Spanish Government [MAT2009-12547, MAT2012-30706]
  2. Fundacion Ramon Areces
  3. European Union through European Regional Development Funds
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) [32623]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81300904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dental plaque is a biofilm that Causes dental caries, gingivitis, and periodontitis. Most of the studies in antibacterial coatings have been conducted by in vitro Single-species biofilm formation, but oral biofilm involves more than 700 different bacterial Species that are able to interact. Therefore, new studies are focused on in vitro multispecies biofilm models that mimic in vivo biofilms. The aim Of the present work was to study different antibacterial coatings onto titanium surfaces and evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial properties of the surfaces on two different bacterial species and an oral biofilm. The lactate dehydrogenase assay determined that treated samples did not affect fibroblast viability. In addition, the viability of microorganisms on modified samples was evaluated by a LIVE/DEAD BacLight bacterial viability kit. Although a decrease in viable bacteria onto, treated samples was obtained, the results Showed differences in effectiveness when single-biofilm and oral plaque were tested. It confirms, as we expected, the distinct sensitivities that bacterial strains have. Thus, this multispecies biofilins model holds a great potential to assess antibacterial properties Onto samples for dental purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据