4.1 Article

Model updating of a rotating machine using the self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm

期刊

INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 504-523

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2015.1047364

关键词

model updating; rotating machine; finite element model; inverse problem; self-adaptive differential evolution

资金

  1. FAPEMIG [TEC-APQ-00076/09]
  2. CNPq through the INCT-EIE [574001/2008-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the good accuracy of finite element (FE) models to represent the dynamic behaviour of mechanical systems, practical applications show significant discrepancies between analytical predictions and experimental results, which are mostly due to uncertainties on the geometry configuration, imprecise material parameters and vague boundary conditions. Thereby, different approaches have been proposed to solve the inverse problems associated with the updating of FE models. Among them, the techniques based on minimization processes have shown to be some of the most promising ones. In this paper, a self-adaptive heuristic optimization method, namely the self-adaptive differential evolution (SADE), is evaluated. Differently from the canonical differential evolution (DE) algorithm, the SADE strategy is able to update dynamically the required parameters such as population size, crossover parameter and perturbation rate. This is done by considering a defined convergence rate on the evolution process of the algorithm in order to reduce the number of evaluations of the objective function. For illustration purposes, the SADE strategy is applied to the solution of typical mathematical functions. Additionally, the strategy is equally used to update the FE model of a rotating machine composed by a horizontal flexible shaft, two rigid discs and two unsymmetrical bearings. For comparison purposes, the canonical DE is also used. The results indicate that the SADE algorithm is a recommended technique for dealing with this kind of inverse problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据