4.6 Article

Exploring the Mechanism of Biocatalyst Inhibition in Microbial Desulfurization

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 79, 期 24, 页码 7807-7817

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02696-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology Training Program from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. Saudi Aramco

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial desulfurization, or biodesulfurization (BDS), of fuels is a promising technology because it can desulfurize compounds that are recalcitrant to the current standard technology in the oil industry. One of the obstacles to the commercialization of BDS is the reduction in biocatalyst activity concomitant with the accumulation of the end product, 2-hydroxybiphenyl (HBP), during the process. BDS experiments were performed by incubating Rhodococcus erythropolis IGTS8 resting-cell suspensions with hexadecane at 0.50 (vol/vol) containing 10 mM dibenzothiophene. The resin Dowex Optipore SD-2 was added to the BDS experiments at resin concentrations of 0, 10, or 50 g resin/liter total volume. The HBP concentration within the cytoplasm was estimated to decrease from 1,100 to 260 mu M with increasing resin concentration. Despite this finding, productivity did not increase with the resin concentration. This led us to focus on the susceptibility of the desulfurization enzymes toward HBP. Dose-response experiments were performed to identify major inhibitory interactions in the most common BDS pathway, the 4S pathway. HBP was responsible for three of the four major inhibitory interactions identified. The concentrations of HBP that led to a 50% reduction in the enzymes' activities (IC(50)s) for DszA, DszB, and DszC were measured to be 60 +/- 5 mu M, 110 +/- 10 mu M, and 50 +/- 5 mu M, respectively. The fact that the IC(50)s for HBP are all significantly lower than the cytoplasmic HBP concentration suggests that the inhibition of the desulfurization enzymes by HBP is responsible for the observed reduction in biocatalyst activity concomitant with HBP generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据