4.6 Article

Genetic Diversity of Newcastle Disease Virus in Wild Birds and Pigeons in West Africa

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 79, 期 24, 页码 7867-7874

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02716-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Cooperation of Luxembourg
  2. Ministry of Health
  3. Ministry of Research
  4. Centre de Recherche Public de la Sante
  5. AFR from the Fonds National de la Recherche, Luxembourg [TR_PHD BFR08-095]
  6. A.P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, Nigeria [70]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In West and Central Africa, virulent Newcastle disease virus (NDV) strains of the recently identified genotypes XIV, XVII, and XVIII are enzootic in poultry, representing a considerable threat to the sector. The increasing number of reports of virulent strains in wild birds at least in other parts of the world raised the question of a potential role of wild birds in the spread of virulent NDV in sub-Saharan Africa as well. We investigated 1,723 asymptomatic birds sampled at live-bird markets and sites important for wild-bird conservation in Nigeria and 19 sick or dead wild birds in Cote d'Ivoire for NDV class I and II. Typical avirulent wild-type genotype I strains were found in wild waterfowl in wetlands in northeastern Nigeria. They were unrelated to vaccine strains, and the involvement of inter-or intracontinental migratory birds in their circulation in the region is suggested. Phylogenetic analyses also revealed that genotype VI strains found in pigeons, including some putative new subgenotype VIh and VIi strains, were introduced on multiple separate occasions in Nigeria. A single virulent genotype XVIII strain was found in a dead wild bird in Cote d'Ivoire, probably as a result of spillover from sick poultry. In conclusion, screening of wild birds and pigeons for NDV revealed the presence a variety of virulent and avirulent strains in West Africa but did not provide strong evidence that wild birds play an important role in the spread of virulent strains in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据