4.6 Article

Platform Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum with Reduced Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Activity for Improved Production of L-Lysine, L-Valine, and 2-Ketoisovalerate

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 79, 期 18, 页码 5566-5575

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01741-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (FNR) of the BMELV (FNR) [220 095 08A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exchange of the native Corynebacterium glutamicum promoter of the aceE gene, encoding the E1p subunit of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHC), with mutated dapA promoter variants led to a series of C. glutamicum strains with gradually reduced growth rates and PDHC activities. Upon overexpression of the L-valine biosynthetic genes ilvBNCE, all strains produced L-valine. Among these strains, C. glutamicum aceE A16 (pJC4 ilvBNCE) showed the highest biomass and product yields, and thus it was further improved by additional deletion of the pqo and ppc genes, encoding pyruvate: quinone oxidoreductase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, respectively. In fed-batch fermentations at high cell densities, C. glutamicum aceE A16 Delta pqo Delta ppc (pJC4 ilvBNCE) produced up to 738 mM (i.e., 86.5 g/liter) L-valine with an overall yield (Y-P/S) of 0.36 mol per mol of glucose and a volumetric productivity (Q(P)) of 13.6 mM per h [1.6 g/(liter x h)]. Additional inactivation of the transaminase B gene (ilvE) and overexpression of ilvBNCD instead of ilvBNCE transformed the L-valine-producing strain into a 2-ketoisovalerate producer, excreting up to 303mM(35 g/liter) 2-ketoisovalerate with a Y-P/S of 0.24 mol per mol of glucose and a Q(P) of 6.9 mM per h [0.8 g/(liter x h)]. The replacement of the aceE promoter by the dapA-A16 promoter in the two C. glutamicum L-lysine producers DM1800 and DM1933 improved the production by 100% and 44%, respectively. These results demonstrate that C. glutamicum strains with reduced PDHC activity are an excellent platform for the production of pyruvate-derived products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据