4.6 Article

Shifting the Fermentative/Oxidative Balance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Transcriptional Deregulation of Snf1 via Overexpression of the Upstream Activating Kinase Sak1p

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 77, 期 6, 页码 1981-1989

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02219-10

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt [AZ 13180]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the aim to reduce fermentation by-products and to promote respiratory metabolism by shifting the fermentative/oxidative balance, we evaluated the constitutive overexpression of the SAK1 and HAP4 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sak1p is one of three kinases responsible for the phosphorylation, and thereby the activation, of the Snf1p complex, while Hap4p is the activator subunit of the Hap2/3/4/5 transcriptional complex. We compared the physiology of a SAK1-overexpressing strain with that of a strain overexpressing the HAP4 gene in wild-type and sdh2 deletion (respiratory-deficient) backgrounds. Both SAK1 and HAP4 overexpressions led to the upregulation of glucose-repressed genes and to reduced by-product formation rates (ethanol and glycerol). SAK1 overexpression had a greater impact on growth rates than did HAP4 overexpression. Elevated transcript levels of SAK1, but not HAP4, resulted in increased biomass yields in batch cultures grown on glucose (aerobic and excess glucose) as well as on nonfermentable carbon sources. SAK1 overexpression, but not the combined overexpression of SAK1 and HAP4 or the overexpression of HAP4 alone, restored growth on ethanol in an sdh2 deletion strain. In glucose-grown shake flask cultures, the sdh2 deletion strain with SAK1 and HAP4 overexpression produced succinic acid at a titer of 8.5 g liter(-1) and a yield of 0.26 mol (mol glucose)(-1) within 216 h. We here report for the first time that a constitutively high level of expression of SAK1 alleviates glucose repression and shifts the fermentative/oxidative balance under both glucose-repressed and -derepressed conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据