4.6 Article

Development and experimental validation of a predictive threshold cycle equation for quantification of virulence and marker genes by high-throughput nanoliter-volume PCR on the OpenArray platform

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 74, 期 12, 页码 3831-3838

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02743-07

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [R01RR018625] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [R01 RR018625, R01 RR018625-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of quantitative PCR (QPCR) assays typically requires extensive screening within and across a given species to ensure specific detection and lucid identification among various pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains and to generate standard curves. To minimize screening requirements, multiple virulence and marker genes (VMGs) were targeted simultaneously to enhance reliability, and a predictive threshold cycle (C,) equation was developed to calculate the number of starting copies based on an experimental C, The empirical equation was developed with Sybr green detection in nanoliter-volume QPCR chambers (OpenArray) and tested with 220 previously unvalidated primer pairs targeting 200 VMGs from 30 pathogens. A high correlation (R-2 = 0.816) was observed between the predicted and experimental C(T)s based on the organism's genome size, guanine and cytosine (GC) content, amplicon length, and stability of the primer's 3' end. The performance of the predictive CT equation was tested using 36 validation samples consisting of pathogenic organisms spiked into genomic DNA extracted from three environmental waters. In addition, the primer success rate was dependent on the GC content of the target organisms and primer sequences. Targeting multiple assays per organism and using the predictive CT equation are expected to reduce the extent of the validation necessary when developing QPCR arrays for a large number of pathogens or other targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据